Whenever the topic of increasing human lifespan is discussed the concern is sometimes raised that a longer life would mean a life spent frail and decrepit. This is sometimes known as the Tithonus error and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the aims of rejuvenation biotechnology.

The concern is based on the ancient Greek myth of Tithonus which might be thought of as a cautionary tale warning seekers of an eternal life of its alleged inherent dangers.

The myth of Tithonus in brief

Tithonus, the story goes, was a mere mortal who was in love with Eos, the beautiful titan of the dawn. His feelings were requited, but, unfortunately, their idyll was not destined to last. Being a titan, Eos was also a deity and thus immortal, unlike Tithonus, who one day would die of old age if not of some other cause. Eos thus turned to Zeus and asked him to make Tithonus immortal as well. Zeus granted Eos’ wish, but even this did not solve the two lovers’ problem; the father of the gods had granted Tithonus immortality, not eternal youth.

Tithonus never died, but he kept aging like any other mortal; eventually, he was so decrepit, disease-ridden, and demented that his life had become unbearable. According to some tellings of the story, the result of this everlasting aging process was that Tithonus became a cricket, begging for death to come and put an end to the prison that his immortality had become; other versions say it was Eos herself who, moved to pity for her lover’s sad fate, decided to change him into a cricket.

We can guess the lesson to be drawn from this tale: Immortality may sound appealing, but there are drawbacks that make it more of a curse than a blessing.

Can anything like this actually happen? No.

This type of concern is sometimes raised by those who don’t have a clear picture of rejuvenation biotechnologies and fear that an extended period of frailty and decrepitude may be what scientists are after. Thankfully, quite the opposite is true, and, in fact, Tithonus’ grim fate is physically impossible.

In the fanciful realm of gods and myths, anything goes and the impossible becomes mundane, but in the real world, neither Zeus nor anyone else could make you live forever without eliminating or obviating the aging process. This is because death is nothing but the result of a critical failure of your inner workings—if you died, it means something crucial in your body stopped functioning properly and thus triggered a cascade of failure whose ultimate consequence was your death.

In particular, in the case of death by old age, the critical failure is caused by one or several pathologies resulting from a life-long process of damage accumulation. This process is slow but insidious, and it starts speeding up considerably after middle age. Frailty, weakness, and all the notorious diseases of old age are its primary consequences and are due to the fact that accumulated damage prevents your body from functioning at its best; when the damage is extensive enough, your body cannot function at all anymore.

Living forever while aging forever would thus be equivalent to a human-made machine still functioning despite all of its mechanisms being eventually completely broken, which is a contradiction in terms. Another way of seeing it is imagining a house that remains a house even though you keep removing its bricks one by one.

To better illustrate this point, consider cell loss, one of the hallmarks of the aging process. In a nutshell, cell loss means that your body tissues lose their building blocks over time; normally, this loss is compensated for by cell division, but during old age, this ability is impaired and, consequently, your tissues waste away.

Throughout this process, we become more fragile and sick, but as long as our tissues have enough cells to perform their job, we will stay alive, although our quality of living will be impaired. Once a tissue has lost enough cells, it can no longer perform its function, and it’s easy to see how this may lead to death—for example, if you lose too many pacemaker cells, your brain will be unable to tell your heart to beat.

More generally, in the legend Tithonus kept on living for centuries despite that he continued to age, his internal organs kept wasting away, eventually disappearing altogether, and yet somehow they still functioned! Talk about having your cake and eating it too.

So, if you are concerned that a longer life would mean never-ending, increasing decrepitude, you can heave a sigh of relief. It won’t happen because it can’t happen.

What is rejuvenation biotechnology all about, then?

A very small-scale version of Tithonus’ myth does actually take place as a consequence of geriatric medicine. Geriatric medicine focuses on treating the symptoms of age-related diseases rather than their causes, with the result of modestly improving patient health and lifespan—in other words, although with the best intentions, geriatrics does prolong the time patients spend in decrepitude.

They live a little longer because mitigating the symptoms slightly postpones the inevitable, but as age-related damage keeps accumulating, eventually the point of no return is reached. It’s a bit like trying to empty a river using a coffee mug.

Rejuvenation biotechnology proposes a different approach, intervening directly on the damage causing age-related pathologies and repairing or obviating it. For example, in the case of the aforementioned problem of cell loss, stem cell therapy could be used to periodically replenish tissues, thus preventing organ and muscle wasting.

Interventions for different types of age-related damage—such as senolytics for senescent cell clearance, enzyme replacement therapy to dispose of intracellular waste, and AGE-breaking molecules to eliminate extracellular cross-links—are currently being developed, and some are even undergoing human clinical trials.

The aim of rejuvenation biotechnology is neither extending frailty nor achieving a modest amelioration of an elderly patient’s health; rather, the goal is to comprehensively address age-related damage to allow people to maintain youthful levels of health for as long as they live, however long that may be. This would require rejuvenating cells, tissues, and organs so that the body functions as it did in youth. So the nightmare scenario of being trapped in a decrepit body while staying alive would not happen as the body would look and function as it did in youth.

Sounds like a much better deal than that Eos struck with Zeus for Tithonus, doesn’t it?

CategoryBlog, Concerns
About the author

Nicola Bagalà

Nicola is a bit of a jack of all trades—a holder of an M.Sc. in mathematics; an amateur programmer; a hobbyist at novel writing, piano and art; and, of course, a passionate life extensionist. After his interest in the science of undoing aging arose in 2011, he gradually shifted from quiet supporter to active advocate in 2015, first launching his advocacy blog Rejuvenaction before eventually joining LEAF. These years in the field sparked an interest in molecular biology, which he actively studies. Other subjects he loves to discuss to no end are cosmology, artificial intelligence, and many others—far too many for a currently normal lifespan, which is one of the reasons he’s into life extension.
  1. July 22, 2018

    Not good enough really. The author makes no mention of what a person might look like once they reach a hundred years or so: it seems enough to simply keep the internal organs from wasting away. No, people want to actually look young as well, as if they were in their prime for example.
    The author also uses words like ‘small’ or ‘little’ to try to convince us of how little geriatric medicine has increased the time of decrepitude and suffering before death. But the truth is, many old people are lingering for years in states of helplessness before they die, often in care homes, and often at great expense to the taxpayer.
    In short what we need is not extended life, but a quality life worth living where death is seen as the normal – and dare I say it – natural conclusion to one’s life. We have to make way for the young, so let us do just that!

    • July 22, 2018

      Hi Susan,

      The very same processes that cause our internal organs to fail with age are exactly the same that cause ‘elderly looks’. As discussed here, a comprehensive enough platform of rejuvenation therapies would not only preserve your health as you age, but also your looks. Sorry if this article didn’t make that clear. I fully understand that people want to keep not only their health but also their looks, and they are right in wanting so, too: as explained here, elderly looks aren’t just a matter of aesthetics.

      The fact older people linger in a state of helplessness actually proves my point, i.e. that geriatric medicine hasn’t done much to improve the overall health and quality of life of older people. The kind of assistance we can provide for older people these days may at best delay death and ease the pain, but we are unable to cure age-related diseases. Rejuvenation biotechnology is poised to do just that—repair the damage caused to the body by the aging processes, so that age-related diseases won’t even manifest themselves. No age-related diseases mean no lingering in helplessness—old people would be just as healthy and functional as when they were chronologically young.

      Note that, in terms of life, quantity is an obvious consequence of quality. You can live for a long time only if you’re healthy enough to do so; as I explained in this same article, it is simply physically impossible to make anyone live to 200 if their health keeps deteriorating. Extending life doesn’t mean extending the period of decrepitude normally experienced at the end right now; it means extending the time of your life spent in good health, of which longevity is only a side effect, if you will.

      Death and aging may be natural, but not all that is natural is good (for example, cancer, or infectious diseases), and not all that is not natural is bad (for example, medicines), so naturalness doesn’t matter. The idea that we “have” to make way for the young is often reiterated, but there’s no real reason why chronologically old people would need to die for the sake of the chronologically young ones. If it’s overpopulation or resource scarcity that you’re concerned about, for example, you can have a look here, here, here, and here (this last one is an article on my own blog). Answers to other common concerns can be found on our website here, or again on my own blog here.


Write a comment:


Your email address will not be published.

14 − 1 =

Privacy Policy / Terms Of Use

       Powered by MMD

Want the latest longevity news? Subscribe to our Newsletter!